Description
Given an integer array arr
, partition the array into (contiguous) subarrays of length at most k
. After partitioning, each subarray has their values changed to become the maximum value of that subarray.
Return the largest sum of the given array after partitioning. Test cases are generated so that the answer fits in a 32-bit integer.
Example 1:
Input: arr = [1,15,7,9,2,5,10], k = 3 Output: 84 Explanation: arr becomes [15,15,15,9,10,10,10]
Example 2:
Input: arr = [1,4,1,5,7,3,6,1,9,9,3], k = 4 Output: 83
Example 3:
Input: arr = [1], k = 1 Output: 1
Constraints:
1 <= arr.length <= 500
0 <= arr[i] <= 109
1 <= k <= arr.length
Thinking Process
The dynamic programming solution works here because the problem has an optimal substructure and overlapping subproblems as in the following example:
Let A = [9, 10, 2, 5]
and K = 3
Let S[n1, n2, ..., ni]
be the solution to subarray [n1, n2, ..., ni]
.
The following are base cases to initialize the memo array:
S[9] = 9 (i.e., memo[0] = 9)
S[9, 10] = 20 (i.e., memo[1] = 20)
S[9, 10, 2] = 30 (i.e., memo[2] = 30)
Here we do the real work, where you need to “loop” through a K-sized window before the new value to be considered, including the new value, which in this case the new value is 5:
The window we “looped” through above is [10, 2, 5].
From the formula above, we see that the overlapping subproblem is in using the solutions from previous solutions stored in the memo, e.g., S[9]
, S[9, 10]
, and S[9, 10, 2]
. The optimal substructure comes from the fact that the solution to S[9, 10, 2, 5]
is solved by using solutions to previously calculated solutions.
Code
Time Complexity: , Space Complexity: